If Hillary’s email server was hacked, as is likely, and there was mention of the State Department’s refusal to increase the security in Benghazi, or the now proven ‘stand down’ order; isn’t it possible that these leaks may have contributed to the events that took place on the anniversary of 9/11 in Libya?
The question I have still not heard: “In the ‘unlikely’ event you are elected president, are you willing to place your assets in a blind trust, as have previous presidents? C’mon, media!
Once again, as in Virginia today, with ever increasing frequency in our society, violence has become an acceptable manner in which to resolve disputes. And again, the media, particularly cable news networks, have exploited the tragedy. All too often, the NEWS is not reported; but it is fueled by speculation, pundit opinion, and not-so carefully crafted commentary; and then repeated for days. Each so-called journalist will have their own interpretation of the facts, and of course, their own frequently inaccurate and dubious conclusions. Adding to this mix and promotion of sensationalism, politicians and other public figures use the incident to forward their own agendas. Certainly, copycats and others on the fringe have no need to be unique. Is it really necessary to suggest to these individuals how and when to commit a heinous felony or act of terrorism?
The email scandal, one of many, gets deeper and deeper for Hilary. Her attempts to explain her actions have no legal or political significance. Never did I believe that Gaffe Biden would look comparatively good to me.
I recently listened to Trump’s words of wisdom in Mobile, Alabama. Why did it take that long to say nothing? If the bluster and narcissism were deleted, there would have been total silence!
Is Trump willing to place his assets in a blind trust if he is elected president?
As the hurdles for Hillary Clinton certainly do get higher, the legions of her followers appear to be getting a bit more realistic about her candidacy. Her approval ratings have declined and more of the electorate are polling that they do not trust her and that she is dishonest. All justifiable. However, the truth is that those that still blindly support her remain deeply intrenched in a popularity contest. Even Hilliary herself and her most ardent groupies can not clearly articulate what positive accomplishments she has contributed to the country while in the office of Secretary of State. Hilliary has additionally committed numerous acts that are arguably illegal. And still her legions carry on. It is time that Americans elect a president on the basis of merit and not one that elevates to the office as a rock star! We have seen the devastation and havoc an inexperienced celeb can bring to our country these past six and one half years.
The blasts are getting louder and more intrusion. There is no longer any question as to whether he is seriously damaging the Republican brand. However, this is only the beginning! Most of the many Republican candidates are treating him with kid gloves; mainly because of his not so subtle and recent innuendos that he will run as a third party candidate. Certainly all Democrats would cheer such an event. But it appears that that possibility does not phase Trump. Of course, such an event could not be successful. There are a small number of people that support his positions, conduct, style and petulance , but the best these misguided individuals can achieve is to partially fill Trump’s huge ego. Unfortunately, there is little evidence that he will voluntarily withdraw his his bid for the nomination. Is anyone really sure he ever left the Democratic Party.
Wouldn’t it be great if law abiding Americans had a choice of 250 “Constitutional Sanctuaries” in which to live. These sanctuaries would provide people with a community in which the US Constitution is respected. Instead, we have 250+ sanctuary cities that protect illegal alien felons. The choice between the two is a no-brainer. Where can Americans find that sanctuary that affords the protection of the Constitution? Perhaps a turn away from the BHO “transformation” would be a step in the right direction.
I wonder, as BHO stalks the corridors of the white house late in the evening, if from the deepest recesses of his mind, it has occurred to him that Iran already has ‘the bomb’? It seems somewhat naive to believe that this might not be the case, and that all the months and years of ‘negotiations’ has been a Middle Eastern version of Kabuki theater where all does not always exist as it appears. The Iranian dance may have been a clever ruse to eliminate the many sanctions that have been imposed on Iran which have long been choking the Iranian economy. The chokehold that prevented Iran from financing and arming their terrorists proxies; from preventing Iran from fully participating in the global oil market; from creating a far greater political influence in their region; and lastly, from improving their domestic economy to assist the many young Iranians and others to improve their lives. Think about the many times we have been told that Iran will have ‘the bomb’ in six months, in one year, in two years and all the additional forecasts put forth by our administration, our ‘experts’ and our many pundits. What do YOU think?